The LGBT issue re-emerged in Indonesia and has become a warm polemic in society, this issue has split the community
into two groups, the supportive and the rejecting groups. Each side expressed their views on this issue with different
reasons and approaches. The two most distinct groups of differing views on this issue are the Indonesian Ulama Council
and the Liberal Islam Network. This study examines the evolutionary thinking dynamics among LGBT Indonesian Muslim
scholars, with the aim of understanding the basis, approach and reasons used by each in determining opinions about
LGBT behavior. The approach used in this study is descriptive comparative, namely the type of research used to compare
between two groups or more than a certain variable. As for the conclusion of this study that MUI strongly opposes LGBT
behavior under the pretext of contradicting the Qoran-Hadis and human nature created in pairs. While JIL groups support
LGBT under the pretext of sexual preference and human rights